A cellphone or mobile phone detector is actually a high gain op amp amplifier which detects slightest of RF disturbance from a mobile phone, and illuminates an LED.
NOTE: This concept was first developed by me and later on the idea was COPIED by many reputed website.
Mobile phones today being the major generator of RF interference is easily picked up by this circuit and can be seen through an LED illumination at the output of the circuit.
Working Concept
The concept behind the working of this mobile phone detector is a highly sensitive comparator circuit which is unstable at its input due to high sensitivity, such that it turns ON even with the minutest electrical interference in the atmosphere around it.
Since it is designed to detect mobile phone signals one may misinterpret it to be detecting the GHz signals, actually it's not, and it simply can't.
Even if the mobile phone signals may be oscillating at GHz levels, the signal is still a radio frequency (RF), having the properties of electrical interference.
It is this electrical interference that is picked up by the op amp input, and converted into a DC output, for illuminating the LED
Circuit Description
The circuit is basically a simple high gain inverting amplifier, built around the IC LM 324. Only two of its op amps may be incorporated, however for making the circuit extremely sensitive, all four of its opamps have been rigged in series.
Looking at the figure we see actually the the circuit is a repetition of four identical circuits in series.
So we would only want to study the basic concept of the any one of the stages consisting just one op amp.
NOTE: Using 4 op amp stages can make the design extremely sensitive and the circuit may start sensing all sorts of RF signal that may be present in the atmosphere. Therefore I recommend using only 2 op amp stages in series for this project.
Parts List
- All R1 = 100K 1/4 watt
- All R2 = 2.2 Meg or any value between 1 Meg and 10 Meg (1/4 watt)
- All C1 = 0.01uF, or 103 ceramic disc or PPC, any type will do.
- A1 --- A4 = LM324 IC
As mentioned in the earlier part of this article, the op amp is configured as a high gain non inverting amplifier, where the input is received at the pin #2 which is the inverting input of the op amp.
The RF disturbances in the air is received by the antenna and fed to the inverting input of the op amp which is amplified by the circuit to some specified level depending on the value of the feed back resistor across the output and the inverting input of the op amp.
Increasing the value of this resistor increases the sensitivity of the circuit, however too much sensitivity can make the circuit unstable and induce oscillations.
The amplified signal is fed to the input of the next stage which is just a replica of the previous stage.
Why it is so Sensitive
It's due to the 4 series op amp stages which helps to make the circuit highly sensitive an this can pick up cellphone RF from a distance of 10 meters.
Here the relatively weaker signals from the first stage is further enhanced and made stronger so that now it may be fed to the third stage for repeating the actions that is for further amplification until the last stage whose output illuminate an LED, displaying the presence of even the minutest possible RF disturbance in the air.
UPDATE:
After a lot of experimentation I finally realized that creating a long range cell phone detector wasn't feasible. It's because the modern phones have a high grade RF shielding, which allows only very little RF to leak out from the phone. Therefore the RF do not reach too far in the atmosphere making it impossible to detect them beyond a few inches from the phone.
To improve the distance I tried making the circuit more sensitive by adding more stages in series, but that didn't work. Because higher sensitivity meant the circuit started detecting many different existing RF disturbances in the air, which kept the LED flickering all the time.
Video Demo
The Finalized Circuit
The finalized tested design can be seen below, it is exactly similar to a WiFi detector circuit
How to Assemble the Circuit
The discussed circuit of cell phone RF signal detector, sensor is very easy to build and requires minimal knowledge of electronic for going about with the procedures. It is built with the following instruction:
After procuring the given components, fix them over the piece of general PCB in the following manner:
Take the IC first, and carefully insert its legs inside the PCB holes through proper alignment.
Solder the leads of the IC.
Now as per the diagram start connecting the resistors and capacitors one by one to the pin outs of the IC, remember that from the component side of the PCB, the pin out will be just the opposite to what it is from the track side, so be careful with the pin out designations and connections.
How to Test
Once it is assembled, it’s all about connecting the board to a 9 volt battery and confirming the results.
For this you may make a call from your cell phone or just call to know your balance report, the LED in the circuit should hopefully start responding to the cell phones generated RF signals.
Alternatively, you may try clicking your kitchen gas lighter very close to the antenna of the circuit; the LED could be seen flashing with the clickings of the gas lighter.
Another way of checking the circuit would be to take it near your mains electric board, the LED should light up when brought even withing a feet near to the board indicating the presence of the mains field and confirming the working of the circuit.
Note: The coil L1 can be made from any gauge wire, just a few turns of any diameter between 5 to 9mm will do.
RF Sniffer using a Single Op Amp
While the RF mobile detector circuit was primarily meant to indicate the existence of RF emissions, this circuit is implemented for several different functions, such as testing car security keys and as a bug detector.
The RF sniffer circuit is so sensitive that it can pick up fields as low as to 1 mW at 1 m distance and from around 100 kHz to 500 MHz signals.
Essentially, it is just a broad -band input circuit, a rectifier and meter, nevertheless for achieving required sensitivity an amplifier is necessary and the diodes should be accurately selected.
Germanium diodes are able to operate even at lower forward voltages compared to the silicon types, and frequency response is bigger using point contact devices, therefore point -contact, germanium 0A90 diodes happen to be the best alternative.
A 1 mH inductor over the input minimizes LF sensitivity, as does the feedback capacitor. Adjusting the meter offset is not important, nonetheless it will enable the nulling of unwanted frequencies.
The meter might require series resistance to fine-tune sensitivity. The display reading may not be linear and will only help to indicate the presence of RF and the relative power of the RF.
Mobile Phone Detector Circuit with Relay
The next mobile detector circuit will not only indicate the mobile RF through an LED, it will also activate a Relay for controlling a desired external load. Thus, this design includes an LED indicator as well as a relay for powering an external load in response to a detected mobile RF signal.
Simply operating a mobile phone near an audio device gives an idea of the strength of the electromagnetic disturbances that a mobile phone is capable of creating.
The strong buzzing at 217 Hz that often occurs is a direct consequence of the communication mode used by the GSM system: short bursts of powerful pulses at 900 or 1800 MHz, repeated at a rate of 4.616 milliseconds. This allows different communications to "pass" simultaneously on the same radio frequency.
The mobile phone does not only emit signals during an active call.
Even in "standby" mode, it periodically responds to network requests so that the network can constantly locate and authenticate it (for better or worse...).
More substantial data exchanges occur when the device is powered on, as well as when it receives a call or a text message (SMS).
Before receiving a call or data, the mobile phone needs to confirm with the network that it is capable of doing so. It is the transmission of this confirmation message that is detected by all standalone "vibrators" sold as accessories, which is why they activate even before the phone rings.
Our circuit operates on the same principle and will therefore react in a very similar way.
The Preamplifier:
To detect the pulse trains emitted by the mobile phone, an approach was conceived to exploit the strong disturbances experienced by audio equipment in the immediate vicinity of operating mobile phones.
It should be noted that with a typical power of 2W (at 900 MHz) or 1W (at 1800 MHz), the mobile phone emits a significant pulsed electromagnetic field in its immediate surroundings.
Some studies suggest that in order to present no risk to health, the phone should be kept at least... twelve meters away from the ear!
At a distance of a few tens of centimeters, the field is sufficient to induce tens or hundreds of millivolts at the terminals of a roughly tuned antenna (for example, a simple unshielded wire, 2, 4, or 8 cm long).
If this conductor is connected to a component acting as a diode, it can capture UHF bursts that reappear as audible impulses. This can cause interference and render amplification ineffective.
In a preamplifier circuit, for example, a rigorous design in terms of electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) allows contemporary (high-quality) products to have an acceptable level of immunity.
Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for older equipment, even if they are still in perfect working condition, and of course, for many low-end devices.
The mobile phone detector circuit diagram in Figure 1 below, relies on a purposely "poor" preamplifier stage, built around a common operational amplifier (half of an LM358).
The significant gain and the input configuration deliberately place it in conditions that make it susceptible to electromagnetic disturbances.
The numerous internal junctions of the integrated circuit are responsible for the actual detection of radio impulses, while the discrete component "doubler" voltage rectifier integrates their envelope in a rather smooth manner.
How the Circuit Works
During each detected UHF impulse, the 22 uF capacitor charges a little more through a 180-ohm resistor. However, during the resting periods between impulses, it discharges slowly through a 27 k-ohm resistor.
It is at this level that the choice of values for the RC components allows for the desired triggering selectivity.
The adopted ratio between the charging and discharging time constants, for example, makes the circuit insensitive to the short data bursts periodically emitted by the mobile phone for identification, even though these bursts can be detected with an oscilloscope at the output of the first operational amplifier.
The much longer data block transmitted just before the phone accepts an incoming call (even if the ringtone is deactivated) is sufficient to charge the capacitor to a level that triggers the comparator (second half of the LM358).
Therefore, a simple transistor is enough to activate a small relay and simultaneously light up an indicator LED.
More ambitious projects could involve a microcontroller to analyze the impulse frequency detected by the first operational amplifier more precisely, potentially preceded by a high-gain UHF amplifier.
This principle is used in mobile phone detectors, particularly by security services, which need to be much more sensitive and free from false alarms.
Construction
Although designed to exploit signals at the limit of microwave frequencies, the circuit uses a perfectly conventional wiring technique.
The printed circuit board in Figure 2 is designed exactly like any other audio preamplifier, except that the most basic rules of electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) have been blissfully ignored.
As a result, it is more susceptible to GSM interference, which can be further increased by adding a tuned antenna.
A large center pad allows for direct mounting, perpendicular to the printed circuit board, of a replacement antenna for a mobile phone, but a rigid wire of 4 or 8 cm can work just as well (it's ultimately a matter of aesthetics).
The wiring of the remaining components, according to the layout in the figure above, does not require any particular comments, except that it is strongly recommended to use screw terminals for the connection of the relay contact to its user circuit and for the 9 to 12V power supply (typically a miniature battery).
How to Use
The circuit does not require any connection to the mobile phone since it operates purely through induction.
In principle, triggering is possible up to a distance of 50cm, or even a meter when the mobile phone is using its maximum transmission power.
It should be noted that mobile phones constantly adjust their transmission power to the minimum level necessary for a good connection with the base station.
In areas with excellent coverage, the power can be significantly reduced, which also increases the battery life.
As a result, the ring relay (or any standalone vibrator) may appear less sensitive. To ensure optimal triggering reliability, the closer the distance, the better.
With a standby power consumption of around a milliampere, the circuit can operate for a long time with a simple 9V battery, but it can also be powered by a vehicle's battery.
In such cases, care should be taken not to exceed the current rating of the relay used (for example, using a "special automotive" relay to control a high-power consumer such as a horn).
In many cases of permanent fixed operation, a mains power supply can be used, provided it is carefully filtered and stabilized due to the device's high sensitivity.
It should be noted that the circuit is capable of detecting other pulsed RF fields emitted by devices other than mobile phones.
It will trigger, for example, when brought close to the door of a functioning microwave oven, even if it is sealed.
This type of observation helps to some extent in clarifying concerns about the health effects of mobile phone use.
It has been suggested that twenty minutes of uninterrupted use would cause a local increase of one degree in brain temperature!
It seems that the radiation experienced is of the same order of magnitude as that which would be received from contact with the door of a certain type of oven for the same duration, which is generally recommended to be avoided when it is operating...
On the other hand, one can often find reassurance regarding the potential harmfulness of fixed station antennas that are scattered everywhere.
Outside their main emission lobe (i.e., right in front, where apparent powers of several hundred watts are common), the circuit generally needs to be brought very close to trigger a response.
It seems that being near or behind fixed station antennas is much less harmful than regularly and extensively using a mobile phone...
Perhaps this little circuit will inspire some of our readers to further explore the subject.
Kirti says
Can we make the circuit with only one IC LM358 will it still works ?
Swagatam says
You can try LM358 IC, it should work.
Kirti says
No, I mean can we modify the circuit to only one opamp will it still works??
If yes please guide me how to do it
Swagatam says
You can modify using a single opamp, as shown in the following diagram:
https://www.homemade-circuits.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/single-opamp-mobile-phone-detector-circuit.jpg
The 2M2 resistor can be adjusted to increase or decrease the sensitivity.
If the loop wire connection from pin#2 of the IC is disconnected, it will increase the sensitivity to maximum.
Kirti says
Sir can we use different IC CA3130 or LM741??
Swagatam says
Yes, other opamps will also work.
Richard says
Hello does anyone has made this circuit in this year ? Does it works for new cellphones ? Please i need help
Yogesh says
Sir,i did that circuit as per the given circuit diagram, But it detects only the house hold live wire rf interference.
It does not detecting my phone’s rf interference…..
Please help to resolve that problem…
Swagatam says
Yogesh, Today’s mobile are well shielded and they usually emit very little RF, so the circuit has to be extremely sensitive. If your transistor circuit is not detecting the RF, then there’s nothing we can do. At the most you can try adding one more transistor in the series and see if that helps.
Yogesh says
Sure sir,i will try that….
Swagatam says
OK great thanks!
Yogesh says
Sir,i have a doubt,whether a Darlington pair transistor circuit with a high current gain able to detect a Mobile phone RF signal? If not means, please explain why
Swagatam says
Yogesh, it is possible to use a few transistors in Darlington mode to detect mobile Rf. Here’s the example design:
https://www.homemade-circuits.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/6-MILLION-GAIN1.gif
Tero says
“The Finalized Circuit” didn’t work for me . I make some “upgrades” : R3 changed to 43K and R2 replace with 50K potentiometer . Now i have good sensitivity and sensitivity adjustment.
Thank you Swagatam !
Swagatam says
Thank you Tero, I am glad it is working for you now!
Fernandino says
Can you give me the entire design equations used to calculate the values of the resistors and capacitors and other components, if you can’t type it write it on a paper and mail me. Please respond.
Swagatam says
Calculations can be difficult to provide due to the unusual application of the op amp in an unstable state. It is actually a inverting amplifier with an open or floating input. Still possibly, I will try to update it soon,
Fernandino says
Please follow up as soon as you can. Just the equations and calculations used to obtain the values of resistors and capacitors is enough.
Swagatam says
The equation is Vout = -Vin(R1/R2) where R1 is the feedback resistor 2M2, R2 is the antenna resistance (0.001 ohms), Vin is the RF voltage detected by the antenna
or C2 value you can use the same calculations as explained here:
How to Calculate Transformerless Power Supplies
Fernandino says
Thank you
Dallas Roberts says
Is it possible to create a simple antenna and circuit for building your own portable RF detector that can pick up more of the RF spectrum – like say from 30 kHz to 300 GHz – and if it is, how do you figure out the antenna size?
Having several family members who get extremely sick when exposed to wireless RF radiation, I’ve been trying to figure out how to build a meter/detector that can alert me to the presence of that invisible danger, but since I’m new to electronics/circuits, it is rather confusing. All the professionally built meters I’ve found cost a fortune and they don’t even detect the majority of the wireless spectrum – they only cover small portions of it.
Swagatam says
Yes it is possible using the explained concept, or using the design posted in this link
https://www.homemade-circuits.com/bug-detector-circuit-rf-sniffer-circuit/
The antenna size can be constant for all the frequencies, because the circuit will not detect the frequency rather only the electrical power from the frequency. If the electrical power is high it will detect it, if the power is unreachable or weak it will not detect it.
Dallas Roberts says
Thanks.
I was looking at the bug detector circuit and this page’s build. The Bug detector says that it picks up the WIFI signal from 2 feet away, which would work good for detecting the bugs, but not really what I’m needing. This one says its range is about 10 meters – which is much better.
How could the build be modified to make it pick up wireless signal from say 200 feet away? Would it need to be built with a larger components or coil? I have a small handheld meter that I purchased (Cornet) that can pick up wireless signals from cell towers over a half mile away (problem with it is that it doesn’t register/detect the majority of the frequencies, only a select few). It also runs on a 9V battery.
Swagatam says
The problem with this circuit is that, since our home may contain all forms of RFs, (even the mains 50/60 Hz is an RF), if you increase the sensitivity then it will start picking all detectable Rf and you may find the LED blinking continuously. This circuit does not detect frequency, it detects the energy level, so only those RFs which has sufficient energy level will be detected. WiFi RF’s energy level is very low therefore it cannot detect it beyond 2 feet…if you increase the sensitivity then it will start picking the mains hum which has much stronger energy level than the WiFi…
Dallas Roberts says
OK, Thanks for the info.
Will have to try this build when I get a chance. I could stand to have a detector to detect the LF coming from the main panel anyway – since it also makes my wife’s EHS worse if she gets too close to it.
Thanks for the website, I’m enjoying it. Now to find the time to build some of these projects 🙂
Swagatam says
Sure, no problems, wish you all the best, and Glad you are enjoying my articles!!
Swagatam says
sorry friend, a PCB design may not be possible at the moment…the circuit has been tested thoroughly by me on a general PCB and it worked superbly….however it failed to work with modern phones at longer distances because modern phones have built in RF suppressor which makes any RF leakage impossible….but the old NOKIA phones will allow Rf detection from over a 5 meters distance.
hummux says
any thoughts on calibrating the device to actually find the signal level in microwatts/cm2 as a function of distance?
Swagatam says
It could be perhaps done by attaching the following circuits at the output end of the above design
https://www.homemade-circuits.com/10-led-tachometer-circuit/
Uwais Mahmood says
Can it detect microwave frequency to detect if there is radiation leakage?
Swagatam says
if it's strong enough, then yes it will detect.
Swagatam says
it's 0.01uF, or 10nF
it can detect all kinds of RF present in the atmosphere along with AC mains hum
Uwais Mahmood says
what is the value of the capacitor 1? what is the symbol as in nano or micro? plus what else can the circuit detect pls
Uwais Mahmood says
hello mate, what is the capacitor value ? 0.01? whats the symbol at the end like micro oe nano
Alvin Yovaan says
Thank you Sir… For the ideas and suggestions… Really appreciate for you time and helpings…. God bless you
Swagatam says
you are welcome!!
Alvin Yovaan says
Ok Sir.. So, How can the detection range of the circuit can be increased from 2 meters to around 10meters? Any suggestions or idea..
Swagatam says
the circuit's sensitivity can be increased by increasing the value of the 2M2 resistor.
however range will primarily depend on the cellphone's RF leakage level…in modern cellphones you may not be able to detect the RF even from 1 meter range due to their perfect RF sealing.
Alvin Yovaan says
So, what is the maximum range(meter) the circuit can detect if the rf is stronger? If it is around 2 meters only how can I increase it to like 10 meters?
Alvin Yovaan says
Sir, Can you help me… I have some questions… This circuit can detect 4G frequency? What is the raduis range of this circuit?
Alvin Yovaan says
Hi sir… I have some questons… This circuit can work for 4G frequency…? And what is the radius range of this circuit?
Swagatam says
Hi Alvin, any RF which may be strong enough to induce a level of voltage in the atmosphere will be detected by this design, so the circuit basically relies on the strength of the Rf and not the frequency.
Swagatam says
thank you, you can try increasing the antenna length, however it will finally depend on the mobile emission strength, if the emission is well blocked internally then the circuit will fail to detect the RF even beyond 2 meters.
Davis Kakumba says
HELO SWAGATAM i did it and worked now can the buzzer be included on that RF detector?
Swagatam says
hello Davis, yes you can try adding a buzzer, but it can be too sensitive, and might begin sounding even at slight RF detection….
Vicky Agawane says
Ok thanks alot sir…
Vicky Agawane says
Sir i want your help to increase area of my circuit for mobile detector using IC CA3130 and disc capacitor 0.22uf Which acts as dipole antenna in circuit. This circuit provides detection under only one and half meter i want to increase the area of detection upto 8 to 10 meters. In circuit after 0.22uf capacitor and CA3130 therer is BC548, LED to its emmiter, then triggering circuit with IC 555 And a buzzer to its output. You please suggest me how can i increase the are of detection. Could i increase antenna length or replace wired antenna by airial antenna, will it work. Please am waiting for your answer sir..
Swagatam says
Hello Vicky, different cellphones emit RF at different intensities, today most cellphones are made in such a way that they don't emit any RF.
When I made this circuit I found that it was impossible to detect RF from some mobile phones even from a distance of 2 meters while from few other cellphones my circuit could detect the signals across rooms.
So no matter how much your circuit may be powerful, if the RF in the particular cellphone is concealed then it would be impossible to detect them.
Vicky Agawane says
Thank you sir for your valuable suggetion. I will like to ask you that do you have any circuit about mobile detection for long detection area or you please suggest me what i can do..
Swagatam says
If the cellphone does not emit any RF then there's no way to detect it, no matter how sensitive the circuit may be…
therefore long distance detection is not possible
Kuldeep Tripathi says
Hi Sir This is Kuldeeep . I'm a big fan of yours . I want to know that is there any mobile detector circuit with 555 Ic if there please inform me, soon please sir.
Swagatam says
Thanks Kuldeep, you can try the following circuit, just replace the touch plate with a long wire, as an antenna
http://www.555-timer-circuits.com/images/555-TouchSw-2.gif
Bugoy says
Hello Sir!
There is no space under the seat, unlike scooters and underbones that have compartments under the seat. Under the seat of my bike is already the fender sir. Only a few milimeters of clearance. I am still planning to continue with the microwave radar detector sensor Sir.
Swagatam says
Hello Bugoy, OK then I think you should go for a circuit which might be most suitable with your bike parameters.
Bugoy says
Hello Sir!
Good morning. Luckily, the set-up worked Sir. Without the bike's battery connected. Thank you. Both happy and faced again with another problem. The location of the module and battery pack. No accessible place in the bike Sir. Are you familiar with the model Honda TMX 155? The only space large enough to house the module and battery pack is inside the air cleaner box. Which has screws on its metal cover and a plastic fairing over it. Below is the picture of the bike Sir. Thank you.
http://www.smctgroup.com/sites/default/files/field/product/honda-tmx-155-black.jpgHello Sir!
Good morning. Luckily, the set-up worked Sir. Without the bike's battery connected. Thank you. Both happy and faced again with another problem. The location of the module and battery pack. No accessible place in the bike Sir. Are you familiar with the model Honda TMX 155? The only space large enough to house the module and battery pack is inside the air cleaner box. Which has screws on its metal cover and a plastic fairing over it. Below is the picture of the bike Sir. Thank you.
http://www.smctgroup.com/sites/default/files/field/product/honda-tmx-155-black.jpg
Swagatam says
That's great Bugoy, congrats to you, finally you have achieved what you were trying for such a long time.
What about the space under the seat, I think most motorcycles have enough space under the seat for accommodating a small circuit like this one?
Bugoy says
Hello Sir!
Thank you for the clarification. But one thing, if ever the circuit works with the proposed set-up, I dont feel like putting a switch on the bike's battery positive to turn it ON or OFF whenever I want to activate or deactivate the alarm. That is for safety reasons. What if I am driving on speed and the switch accidentally tripped? A lot bigger consequence will happen. Automotive battery connections must always be secure, as for my opinion.
Swagatam says
Hello Bugoy, a good quality switch can never trip automatically because any heavy duty SPDT switch will require a relatively strong force for operating, how can it trip by itself? If at all this idea works then you must feel lucky and happy about it. However, if you are worried about a consequence that's highly unlikely, then I cannot see any other option left but to quit…moreover a speeding vehicle is never safe under any condition…so you must never drive at high speeds that's more important, because a bike or any vehicle can acquire a hidden fault anytime which you can never predict…